Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Kia Venga 2009
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 17.4 seconds | |
|
Kia Venga is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 7 HP less power than Kia Venga, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Kia Venga. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Kia Venga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia RIO, Hyundai ix20 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Venga might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.07 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.60 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 11 cm shorter than the Kia Venga, 25 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 440 litres | |
|
Kia Venga has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 80 litres less trunk space than the Kia Venga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Kia Venga, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Venga scores higher in safety tests, butCitroen Nemo is better rated in child safety tests. The Kia Venga scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Kia Venga has
| |