Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Ford S-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 72 HP less power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Ford S-Max. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 7.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford S-Max engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford Galaxy, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford S-Max might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Ford S-Max 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford S-Max 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 81 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 14 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 360 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2000 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1.6 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |