Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 47 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.63 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 42 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 19 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1684 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 72 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1.1 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen Nemo is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |