Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 22 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen Nemo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 5 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford C-Max might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.60 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 37 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 20 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 190 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |