Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Ford B-Max 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Citroen Nemo engine produces 27 HP less power than Ford B-Max, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Ford B-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 4.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford B-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford B-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Nemo could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford B-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford B-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.60 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 12 cm shorter than the Ford B-Max, 27 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 318 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1386 litres | |
|
Citroen Nemo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Nemo has 42 litres more trunk space than the Ford B-Max. The Ford B-Max may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford B-Max, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford B-Max scores higher in safety tests. The Ford B-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Ford B-Max has
| |