Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Fiat Scudo 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 128 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Citroen Nemo engine produces 60 HP less power than Fiat Scudo, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Fiat Scudo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 80 litres | |
830 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.96 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 2.02 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.98 m | |
Citroen Nemo is 85 cm shorter than the Fiat Scudo, 12 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 26 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 5000 litres | |
Fiat Scudo has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 4640 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Scudo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 12.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 2.2 metres less than that of the Fiat Scudo, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`856 | |
Safety: | |||
Citroen Nemo scores higher in safety tests, but Fiat Scudo is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen Nemo scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 11 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Fiat Scudo has
| |