Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Fiat Doblo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Citroen Nemo engine produces 17 HP less power than Fiat Doblo, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Fiat Doblo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Doblo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.82 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 29 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, 30 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 750 litres | |
|
Fiat Doblo has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 390 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Fiat Doblo, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |