Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Fiat Doblo 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Fiat Doblo is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 22 HP less power than Fiat Doblo, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Fiat Doblo. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Doblo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen Nemo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Fiat Grande Punto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat Doblo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.85 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 43 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, 23 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 790 litres | |
|
Fiat Doblo has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 430 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1.2 metres less than that of the Fiat Doblo, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |