Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Dacia Lodgy 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Dacia Lodgy is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 22 HP less power than Dacia Lodgy, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Dacia Lodgy. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Lodgy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Lodgy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Nemo could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Lodgy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Lodgy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Lodgy might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen Nemo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Lodgy 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Lodgy 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 54 cm shorter than the Dacia Lodgy, 27 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 827 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 827 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 360 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1.1 metres less than that of the Dacia Lodgy, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Dacia Lodgy scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Dacia Lodgy has
| |