Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Dacia Dokker 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Dacia Dokker is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 22 HP less power than Dacia Dokker, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Dacia Dokker. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Dokker gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen Nemo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.81 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 40 cm shorter than the Dacia Dokker, 27 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 800 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3000 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 440 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Dokker. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1.1 metres less than that of the Dacia Dokker, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Dacia Dokker has
| |