Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 42 HP less power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 407 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.64 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 32 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 27 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1.5 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |