Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Citroen C3 Picasso 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 215 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
Citroen C3 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 22 HP less power than Citroen C3 Picasso, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Citroen C3 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.2 | |
The Citroen C3 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Nemo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Nemo could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
1180 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
Citroen C3 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.96 m | 4.08 m | |
Width: | 2.02 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
Citroen Nemo is 12 cm shorter than the Citroen C3 Picasso, 25 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 385 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 25 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3 Picasso. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C3 Picasso, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`771 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has
| |