Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Citroen C3 Picasso 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 42 HP less power than Citroen C3 Picasso, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Citroen C3 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 Picasso, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C3 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 12 cm shorter than the Citroen C3 Picasso, 25 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1506 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 25 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C3 Picasso, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`807 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has
| |