Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 17 HP less power than Toyota Urban Cruiser, whereas torque is 87 NM less than Toyota Urban Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.6 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Nemo consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Nemo could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Urban Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.53 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Nemo is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 314 litres | |
|
Citroen Nemo has more luggage capacity. Citroen Nemo has 42 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`625 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Urban Cruiser scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
| |