Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Renault Kangoo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 17 HP less power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Renault Kangoo. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.1 | |
|
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Nemo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Citroen Nemo is smaller. Citroen Nemo is 25 cm shorter than the Renault Kangoo, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 438 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1977 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 82 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1 metres less than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`924 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |