Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Kia Venga 2009
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Kia Venga is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 17 HP less power than Kia Venga, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Kia Venga. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Venga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Venga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Nemo could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Venga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Venga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Citroen Nemo is smaller, but higher. Citroen Nemo is 11 cm shorter than the Kia Venga, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 440 litres | |
|
Kia Venga has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 84 litres less trunk space than the Kia Venga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Kia Venga, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Venga scores higher in safety tests, butCitroen Nemo is better rated in child safety tests. The Kia Venga scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Kia Venga has
| |