Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Fiat Doblo 2005

 
Citroen Nemo
2009 - 2015
Fiat Doblo
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 73 HP77 HP
Torque: 118 NM115 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.2 secondsn/a seconds
Citroen Nemo engine produces 4 HP less power than Fiat Doblo, but torque is 3 NM more than Fiat Doblo.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.67.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km8.8 l/100km
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway950 km on highway
550 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Fiat Doblo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.96 m4.25 m
Width: 1.72 m1.72 m
Height: 1.72 m1.82 m
Citroen Nemo is smaller.
Citroen Nemo is 29 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Nemo is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 356 litres750 litres
Fiat Doblo has more luggage space.
Citroen Nemo has 394 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Doblo.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Fiat Doblo, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`690no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 28002400
Pros and Cons: Citroen Nemo has
  • lower fuel consumption
Fiat Doblo has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv