Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Fiat Doblo 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 73 HP | 77 HP | |
Torque: | 118 NM | 115 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Citroen Nemo engine produces 4 HP less power than Fiat Doblo, but torque is 3 NM more than Fiat Doblo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
550 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Fiat Doblo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.96 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.82 m | |
Citroen Nemo is smaller. Citroen Nemo is 29 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Nemo is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 750 litres | |
Fiat Doblo has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 394 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Fiat Doblo, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |