Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Citroen Nemo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Toyota Urban Cruiser has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen Nemo is available only with front wheel drive, while Toyota Urban Cruiser can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 73 HP | 90 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 132 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 - 18 seconds | 11.7 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.6 | 4.6 - 6.0 | |
|
Citroen Nemo petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Urban Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Citroen Nemo is larger. Citroen Nemo is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, 14 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 314 litres | |
|
Citroen Nemo has more luggage capacity. Citroen Nemo has 46 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 1`553 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Urban Cruiser scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
| |