Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Renault Kangoo 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citroen Nemo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Renault Kangoo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | 1.5 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 73 HP | 70 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 128 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 - 18 seconds | 13 - 20.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.6 | 5.2 - 8.1 | |
|
Citroen Nemo petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Kangoo. On average, Citroen Nemo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 25 cm shorter than the Renault Kangoo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 438 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1977 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 78 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1 metres less than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 1`943 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |