Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Peugeot Bipper 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 | 1.2 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 73 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 118 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 - 18 seconds | 16.2 - 16.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.6 | 4.5 - 6.6 | |
|
On average, the Citroen Nemo petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Peugeot Bipper. On average, a Citroen Nemo with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Peugeot Bipper. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Citroen Nemo is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Nemo and Peugeot Bipper are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 884 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot Bipper, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
| |