Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Fiat Doblo 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 73 HP | 77 - 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 115 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 - 18 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.6 | 5.5 - 9.0 | |
|
Citroen Nemo petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Fiat Doblo. On average, Citroen Nemo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.82 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 29 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, 15 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 750 litres | |
|
Fiat Doblo has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 390 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Fiat Doblo, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |