Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Citroen Xsara 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Citroen Nemo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Citroen Xsara has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 73 HP | 68 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 120 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 - 18 seconds | 8.6 - 16.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.6 | 4.5 - 7.7 | |
|
Citroen Nemo petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. On average, Citroen Nemo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.40 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 23 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 17 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 32 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 1`088 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |