Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Citroen C3 Picasso 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Citroen Nemo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Citroen C3 Picasso has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 - 73 HP | 90 - 120 HP | |
Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 133 - 245 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 - 18 seconds | 11.7 - 15.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.6 | 4.2 - 6.4 | |
Citroen Nemo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3 Picasso. On average, Citroen Nemo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.96 m | 4.08 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
Citroen Nemo is 12 cm shorter than the Citroen C3 Picasso, 10 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 385 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1506 litres | |
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 25 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3 Picasso. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C3 Picasso, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 1`773 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has
| |