Citroen Jumpy 2016 vs Toyota Proace 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 177 HP | 120 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 400 NM | 260 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 13.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 5.9 | 4.8 - 6.3 | |
|
On average, a Citroen Jumpy with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Toyota Proace. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Jumpy and Toyota Proace are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 655 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 3968 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`839 kg | ~ 2`781 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`649 kg | ~ 1`758 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`190 kg | ~ 1`023 kg | |
| Citroen Jumpy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Toyota Proace. Therefore, Citroen Jumpy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Jumpy has
|
| |