Citroen Jumpy 2012 vs Renault Trafic 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 - 163 HP | 90 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 340 NM | 260 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.1 - 19 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.6 | 6.6 - 7.5 | |
|
On average, Citroen Jumpy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Jumpy is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Trafic, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 770 litres | 2150 litres | |
|
Renault Trafic has more luggage space. Citroen Jumpy has 1380 litres less trunk space than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 13.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Jumpy is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Trafic, which means Citroen Jumpy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`795 | ~ 2`790 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Trafic scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Trafic scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Trafic has
| |