Citroen Jumpy 2006 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citroen Jumpy is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Sharan has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 163 HP | 140 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 - 340 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 - 20.3 seconds | 8.3 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 10.1 | 5.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Citroen Jumpy petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Citroen Jumpy equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.74 m | |
| Citroen Jumpy is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Jumpy is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 809 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen Jumpy has 290 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. This could mean that the Citroen Jumpy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`742 | ~ 2`337 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Jumpy has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |