Citroen Jumpy 2004 vs Ford Tourneo 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.9 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 (diesel) | |
Both cars are available with diesel engines. Citroen Jumpy is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 71 - 136 HP | 90 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 220 - 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 12.5 - 15.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.0 - 6.4 | |
On average, Citroen Jumpy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.45 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.71 m | 1.91 m | |
Citroen Jumpy is larger, but lower. Citroen Jumpy and Ford Tourneo are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 4000 litres | 610 litres | |
Citroen Jumpy has more luggage capacity. Citroen Jumpy has 3390 litres more trunk space than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`185 | ~ 2`220 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 5800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Jumpy has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |