Citroen Jumpy 2000 vs Nissan Serena 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen Jumpy is available only with front wheel drive, while Nissan Serena can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 136 HP | 145 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 186 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 - 22.3 seconds | 13 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 8.0 | 7.8 - 8.3 | |
|
On average, Citroen Jumpy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Serena. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.83 m | |
| Citroen Jumpy is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan Serena, 12 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Jumpy is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4000 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Serena has more luggage space. Citroen Jumpy has 120 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Serena. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Jumpy is 1.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Serena, which means Citroen Jumpy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`205 | ~ 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Jumpy has
|
Nissan Serena has
| |