Citroen DS5 2011 vs BMW 5 series 2013
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 112 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Citroen DS5 engine produces 31 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 90 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Citroen DS5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.5 | |
Citroen DS5 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Citroen DS5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1550 km in combined cycle | |
1460 km on highway | 1700 km on highway | ||
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen DS5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 18 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Citroen DS5 2011 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen DS5 2011 1.6 engine BMW 5 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.91 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
Citroen DS5 is 38 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen DS5 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 520 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1288 litres | no data | |
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. Citroen DS5 has 55 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen DS5 is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Citroen DS5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`235 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 15 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen DS5 has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |