Citroen DS5 2011 vs Volvo V40 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 275 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen DS5 engine produces 24 HP less power than Volvo V40, but torque is 35 NM more than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Citroen DS5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.4 | |
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen DS5 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen DS5 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
Citroen DS5 is larger. Citroen DS5 is 16 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen DS5 is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1288 litres | no data | |
Citroen DS5 has more luggage capacity. Citroen DS5 has 130 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`035 | 1`920 | |
Safety: | |||
Volvo V40 scores higher in safety tests, butCitroen DS5 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen DS5 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |