Citroen DS5 2011 vs BMW 5 series 2013
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Citroen DS5 engine produces 14 HP less power than BMW 5 series, but torque is 25 NM more than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Citroen DS5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.7 | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen DS5 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen DS5 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen DS5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
| Citroen DS5 is 38 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen DS5 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1288 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. Citroen DS5 has 55 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen DS5 is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Citroen DS5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`035 kg | 2`225 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`495 kg | 1`615 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 540 kg | 610 kg | |
| Citroen DS5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than BMW 5 series. Therefore, BMW 5 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen DS5 has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |