Citroen DS5 2011 vs Volvo V40 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 - 200 HP | 115 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 340 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 12.4 seconds | 6.3 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 7.1 | 3.2 - 9.0 | |
|
Citroen DS5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Citroen DS5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Citroen DS5 is larger. Citroen DS5 is 16 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen DS5 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 468 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1288 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen DS5 has more luggage capacity. Citroen DS5 has 133 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`092 | ~ 1`976 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V40 scores higher in safety tests, butCitroen DS5 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen DS5 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |