Citroen DS4 2015 vs Volvo V40 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Citroen DS4 engine produces 31 HP more power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.2 | |
|
The Citroen DS4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen DS4 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Citroen DS4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1390 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1570 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| Citroen DS4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.45 m | |
| Citroen DS4 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen DS4 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1021 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen DS4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen DS4 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Citroen DS4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`975 kg | 2`040 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`495 kg | 1`398 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 480 kg | 642 kg | |
| Citroen DS4 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 34 procentiem less than Volvo V40. Therefore, Volvo V40 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V40 scores higher in safety tests, butCitroen DS4 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen DS4 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |