Citroen DS4 2011 vs Volvo V40 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Citroen DS4 engine produces 3 HP less power than Volvo V40, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen DS4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 3.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen DS4 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen DS4 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen DS4 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1460 km on highway | 1820 km on highway | ||
| 1110 km with real consumption | 1240 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo S40, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen DS4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen DS4 2011 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen DS4 2011 1.6 engine Volvo V40 2012 1.6 engine: The main issues reported by owners are frequent oil and coolant leaks. The Siemens fuel system with piezo injectors is highly sensitive to fuel quality, requiring the use of high-grade diesel to avoid ... More about Volvo V40 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.44 m | |
| Citroen DS4 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen DS4 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1021 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen DS4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen DS4 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen DS4 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Citroen DS4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V40 scores higher in safety tests, butCitroen DS4 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen DS4 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |