Citroen C-Elysee 2016 vs Audi A3 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C-Elysee engine produces 58 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 133 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Citroen C-Elysee reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C-Elysee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C-Elysee consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C-Elysee could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C-Elysee consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Citroen C-Elysee is smaller, but higher. Citroen C-Elysee is 4 cm shorter than the Audi A3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C-Elysee is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 425 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 880 litres | |
|
Citroen C-Elysee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Audi A3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Elysee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi A3. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`470 kg | 1`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 980 kg | 1`250 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 490 kg | 550 kg | |
| Citroen C-Elysee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Audi A3. Therefore, Audi A3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Elysee has
|
Audi A3 has
| |