Citroen C-Elysee 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C-Elysee engine produces 38 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 93 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Citroen C-Elysee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C-Elysee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C-Elysee consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Citroen C-Elysee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C-Elysee consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C-Elysee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Citroen C-Elysee is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C-Elysee is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C-Elysee is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 419 litres | |
|
Citroen C-Elysee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Elysee is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`470 kg | 1`835 kg | |
| Net weight: | 980 kg | 1`240 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 490 kg | 595 kg | |
| Citroen C-Elysee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Elysee has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |