Citroen C-Elysee 2016 vs Dacia Logan 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 NM | 97 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Elysee is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C-Elysee engine produces 7 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Citroen C-Elysee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C-Elysee consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that by driving the Citroen C-Elysee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C-Elysee consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dacia Logan engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008, Opel Crossland | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Micra, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C-Elysee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Citroen C-Elysee is larger, but lower. Citroen C-Elysee is 7 cm longer than the Dacia Logan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C-Elysee is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1257 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Elysee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`470 kg | 1`545 kg | |
| Net weight: | 980 kg | 1`049 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 490 kg | 496 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Elysee has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |