Citroen C-Elysee 2012 vs Dacia Logan 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 201 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Elysee is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C-Elysee engine produces 17 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Citroen C-Elysee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C-Elysee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C-Elysee consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C-Elysee could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C-Elysee consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C-Elysee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Citroen C-Elysee is larger, but lower. Citroen C-Elysee is 8 cm longer than the Dacia Logan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C-Elysee is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Elysee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`548 kg | 1`590 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`090 kg | 1`059 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 458 kg | 531 kg | |
| Citroen C-Elysee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Dacia Logan. Therefore, Dacia Logan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Elysee has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |