Citroen C-Elysee 2012 vs Volvo V40 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 - 115 HP | 115 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 230 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 14.2 seconds | 6.3 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.3 | 3.2 - 9.0 | |
|
Citroen C-Elysee petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Citroen C-Elysee equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Citroen C-Elysee is 6 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C-Elysee is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 335 litres | |
|
Citroen C-Elysee has more luggage capacity. Citroen C-Elysee has 171 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Elysee is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Citroen C-Elysee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`523 | ~ 1`976 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V40 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo V40 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Elysee has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |