Citroen C8 2004 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Citroen C8) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Space Wagon) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C8 engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, but torque is 90 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Citroen C8 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 9.3 | |
|
The Citroen C8 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C8 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Citroen C8 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C8 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 41 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Ulysse, Peugeot 607 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Citroen C8 is larger. Citroen C8 is 13 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C8 is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2948 litres | 240 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C8 (by 2708 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C8 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`500 kg | 2`180 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C8 has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |