Citroen C8 2004 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C8 engine produces 10 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, but torque is 3 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. Due to the lower power, Citroen C8 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.7 | |
|
The Citroen C8 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C8 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Citroen C8 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C8 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Citroen C8 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C8 is 8 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C8 is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2948 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C8 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Citroen C8 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C8 has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |