Citroen C8 2004 vs Ford S-Max 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C8 engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Ford S-Max. Due to the lower power, Citroen C8 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford S-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C8 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C8 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C8 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Ulysse, Peugeot 607 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford Galaxy, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford S-Max might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Ford S-Max 2006 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford S-Max 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.66 m | |
| Citroen C8 is 4 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C8 is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 854 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 854 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2948 litres | 2100 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C8 (by 848 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C8 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Citroen C8 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C8 has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |