Citroen C8 2002 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2005

 
Citroen C8
2002 - 2004
Volkswagen Sharan
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP140 HP
Torque: 315 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.6 seconds12.8 seconds
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen C8 engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, but torque is 5 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Citroen C8 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.46.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km7.6 l/100km
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen C8 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C8 could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C8 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1080 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
970 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.63 m
Width: 1.85 m1.81 m
Height: 1.86 m1.73 m
Citroen C8 is larger.
Citroen C8 is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C8 is 13 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 225 litres256 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 225 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data256 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2948 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`5052`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 20002600
Pros and Cons: Citroen C8 has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv