Citroen C8 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C8 engine produces 31 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Citroen C8 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C8 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C8 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C8 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Citroen C8 is larger. Citroen C8 is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C8 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2948 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C8 has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |