Citroen C8 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Citroen C8 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C8 engine produces 23 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Citroen C8 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen C8 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Citroen C8 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C8 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C8 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Citroen C8 is larger. Citroen C8 is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C8 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2948 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C8 has
|
| |