Citroen C8 2002 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 138 HP | 145 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C8 engine produces 7 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen C8 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 8.2 | |
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C8 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C8 could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.86 m | 1.72 m | |
Citroen C8 is 9 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C8 is 14 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 225 litres | 308 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 225 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 308 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2948 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`435 | 1`100 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C8 has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |