Citroen C8 2008 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C8 engine produces 2 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen C8 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C8 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C8 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C8 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 1080 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen C8 2008 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Citroen C8 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Citroen C8 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C8 is 13 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C8 is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 480 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2948 litres | 2430 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Seat Alhambra has more luggage space (by 329 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C8 (by 518 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C8 is 1 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Citroen C8 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`530 kg | 2`540 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`983 kg | 1`851 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 547 kg | 689 kg | |
| Citroen C8 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem less than Seat Alhambra. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C8 has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |