Citroen C8 2008 vs Chevrolet Orlando 2011
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 138 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Chevrolet Orlando is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C8 engine produces 25 HP less power than Chevrolet Orlando, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Chevrolet Orlando. Due to the lower power, Citroen C8 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
By specification Citroen C8 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C8 could require 165 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C8 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
1330 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
1080 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C8 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C8 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C8 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Citroen C8 2008 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Citroen C8 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.65 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.86 m | 1.63 m | |
Citroen C8 is 7 cm longer than the Chevrolet Orlando, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C8 is 22 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 458 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 480 litres | 458 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2948 litres | 458 litres | |
In 7-seat version Citroen C8 has more luggage space (by 22 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C8 (by 2490 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C8 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Orlando, which means Citroen C8 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`530 | 2`287 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3800 | 5000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C8 has
|
Chevrolet Orlando has
| |