Citroen C8 2002 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 208 HP | 130 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 320 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 16.6 seconds | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 11.5 | 6.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Citroen C8 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Citroen C8 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.72 m | |
| Citroen C8 is 9 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C8 is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2948 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C8 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C8 has 90 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. The Ford Galaxy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C8 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Citroen C8 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`493 | ~ 1`768 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C8 has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |