Citroen C8 2002 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 208 HP | 110 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 320 NM | 170 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 16.6 seconds | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 11.5 | 5.7 - 8.9 | |
|
Citroen C8 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4 Picasso. On average, Citroen C8 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Citroen C8 is larger. Citroen C8 is 26 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C8 is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2948 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Citroen C8 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This could mean that the Citroen C8 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C8 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Citroen C8 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`493 | ~ 1`426 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C8 has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |